The Chemical Bond
http://www.catalysis.nl/~chembond/

Course Information
Course contents
Lecture Notes
Exercises
Contacting Information
What's New?
Homepage

Transforming the molecular orbitals.

The theory of the chemical bond uses MO's so extensively, and MO's are such an integral part of this theory, that one might easily forget that MO's are a purely theoretical construct and that they do not correspond to anything real. The fundamental quantity in quantum chemistry is the all-electron wave function. We use MO's to construct these wave function via Slater determinants, but that is something that we do, not because the laws of physics request it, but because that makes working with wave functions easier. In fact, even if we construct a Slater determinant from MO's, we can do this in many ways. There is an infinite number of sets of MO's, each of which give exactly the same Slater determinant. It is up to us to choose which set to use, and we make this choice based on what is most convenient to us.

To see how different sets of MO's can give the same Slater determinant, we have to look at the properties of a determinant. A n×n matrix A consists of n2 numbers

A = æ
ç
ç
ç
ç
è
a11
a12
...
a1n
a21
a22
...
a2n
...
...
...
an1
an2
...
ann
ö
÷
÷
÷
÷
ø
.
The determinant of this matrix is just one number. It should be no surprise that we can change the matrix without changing its determinant. We can add one row (column) of the matrix to another row (column) and the determinant does not change. More general, a unitary transformation with determinant equal to 1 of the rows (columns) does not change the determinant. (Remember that a unitary transformation of the rows replaces aij by åkuikakj with uik being matrix elements of a matrix U with |det(U)| = 1. If the matrix elements of U are real then det(U) = 1 or -1, and the transformation is called orthogonal. A unitary transformation changes det(A) to det(U)det(A). So if det(U) = 1, then the determinant of A does not change.)

A Slater determinant has the form

1
  __
ÖN!
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
y1(1)
y1(2)
...
y1(N)
y2(1)
y2(2)
...
y2(N)
...
...
...
yN(1)
yN(2)
...
yN(N)
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
ê
for a system with N electrons. The rows are characterized by the spin orbitals yi. Replacing yi(j) by åkuikyk(j) (a transformation of the rows) is the same as replacing yi by åkuikyk; i.e., a transformation of the orbitals. If det(U) = 1, then this transformation of the orbitals does not change the determinant. As this determinant is the wave function, such a transformation of the orbitals does not change the wave function, and so does not change any of the the properties of the system at all.

If we approximate an all-electron wave function by a Slater determinant and use the variation principle, then we get the Fock equation. There are many ways to choose the orbitals that give the Slater determinant with the lowest energy as we have just seen. Therefore it may be a bit of a surprise that the Fock equation gives unique and well-defined orbitals. The reason for this can be found in the derivation of the Fock equation. At a certain point in that derivation a choice is made for a particular set of orbitals. This set simplifies the rest of the derivation. Although how this is done is beyond the scope of this course, it is important to realize that this has been done. It is also important to know that we can only interpret the energies of the orbitals that are solutions of the Fock equation as ionization potentials and electron affinities by using Koopmans's theorem.

The orbitals that the Fock equation gives are not always convenient. In general, it is not possible to assign an orbital to a single bond. Orbitals that solve the Fock equation are often spread out over more than one bond. For many molecules it is possible to make a unitary transformation of the orbitals that form the Slater determinant to get new orbitals that are each localized at bonds. (Note that you should only use the orbitals that form the Slater determinant, and not the unoccupied orbitals that you also get from the Fock equation.) This turns out to be very useful to explain the structure of a molecule. For some molecules (e.g., benzene) it is not possible to make such a transformation. Such molecule have special properties, because of this. One one talks about delocalization.

Last updated: Thursday, March 20, 2003
© Dr. A.P.J. Jansen